Effects of Banana Clones and Spacing on Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of some Banana Cultivars

Author: Dr. AbdElgadir D.A. Mohammed
Assistant Professor, Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Sinnar, Abu Naama, Sudan

Email: abdelgadir-ahmed@hotmail.com
Doi: doi.org/10.52132/Ajrsp.e.2022.41.1


Abstract:

Afield experiment was carried out at the National Institute for the Promotion of Horticultural Exports (NIPHE) research farm, University of Gezira, Wad Medani, Sudan, to study the effects of banana clones and spacing on vegetative growth, crop earliness, yield and yield components, fruit green life and fruit quality of some introduced banana clones under Gezira state conditions. Treatments consisted of six new banana clones, namely, Williams hybrid clone 1 (WH1), Williams hybrid clone 2 (WH2), Grand Nain clone 1 (GN1), Grand Nain clone 2 (GN2), Zelig and Bio, which were introduced from South Africa by NIPHE. The introduced clones were compared with the local cultivar Dwarf Cavendish (DC). All clones were grown at spacings of 2x2 m and 3x3 m. These treatments were arranged in a split plot design with three replications and four plants each. Results showed that vegetative growth parameters, crop earliness, yield and yield components, fruit green life and fruit quality were significantly affected by spacing and banana clones. WH1 and Zelig obtained the best vegetative growth, whereas DC obtained the worst growth. Zelig and Bio scored the highest yield and yield components, while DC scored the lowest yield in the three ratoons. WH1 took the largest number of days from shooting to harvesting, whereas Zelig recorded the highest exportable yield in the three ratoons.

Keywords:

Effects, Banana clones, Spacing, growth, Yield, Yield component, Fruit quality, Exportable hands.

Download PDF
AJRSP
International peer-reviewed journal
Established in 2019
ISSN: 2706-6495
Email: editor@ajrsp.com

Ongoing Issue: 77
Publication Date:
5 September 2025

Peer-Review statement

All articles published in this journal undergo a rigorous double-blind peer review by independent experts to ensure academic integrity and research quality.

Review Timeline

Avg. Time for Desk Review:
1–2 weeks
Avg. Time per Review Round:
3–4 weeks

Helpful Links
  • Author Guidelines
  • Review Guidelines
  • Publication Fields
  • Publication Fee
  • Manuscript Template
  • Journal Policies
  • Journal Indexing
  • Contact us

  • Archive
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • All copyrights reserved to the Academic Journal of Research and Scientific Publishing by Creative Commons License

    ajrsp